![]() The passive voice lends an impersonal tone to the writing which was perceived to be more objective and formal. Until recently, it was the norm to use passive construction in scientific writing. ![]() In this construction, the phrase “by the authors” can be omitted, which means that the reader already knows or does not need to know who the doer is only the action is important. On the other hand, in the passive voice, the action being performed is emphasized, and the doer may be omitted.Įxample: Experiments were conducted on planetary gear trains (by the authors). Here, the doer (in this case “the authors”) seems important. The active voice refers to a sentence format that emphasizes the doer of an action.Įxample: The authors conducted experiments on planetary gear trains. All sentences in English are either in the active voice or in the passive voice. So, which is preferable, the active or the passive voice?īefore we get to that, let’s understand the difference between these two kinds of construction. So, what should authors do? Should they depart from tradition and stop using the passive voice completely? Would using the active voice lend that scholarly tone to the article? Such questions keep bothering researchers when they write their papers. ![]() Traditionally, the passive voice was used in scientific writing, but in recent times, there has been a shift from this trend, with journals and editors increasingly showing a preference for the active voice. While some writers argue against the use of passive voice in academic writing, others claim it should be used liberally. The usage of active versus passive voice is often a source of confusion in scientific writing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |